Trying to make sense of Batman V Superman

tgfgfgI did not enjoy Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice. There are things to like about it, but overall this is not a good time at the movies (something you kind of expect when you sit down to watch one of these things).

Anyways, beyond trying to figure out just what the hell was going on in this movie, I’m also trying to make sense of the titular heroes and what the character arcs were exactly. If the characters are compelling, you can forgive a lot when it comes to plot. But if they’re badly written? That’s when you start asking all the questions the filmmakers would rather have you ignore.

So as an experiment, I’m gonna list out all the major things that happen to a bunch of the characters in this movie to see if their motivations and actions are consistent, or at least understandable. This is gonna be all SPOILERS so don’t read if you haven’t seen the movie (and I honestly don’t recommend it unless you’re a hardcore DC fan):

Batman/Bruce Wayne…

  • arrives in Metropolis during the Superman/Zod fight from Man of Steel
  • saves an employee (Wally) who’s trapped under some wreckage
  • sees the destruction that Superman is capable of for the first time
  • searches for a large sample of kryptonite found from the wreckage of the giant thingy Superman busted in the Indian Ocean in Man of Steel
  • brands a low-level criminal with the bat symbol, which a news report tells us will get the criminal beaten to death in prison
  • has a conversation with Alfred where he expresses his extreme viewpoint on Superman: “If we believe there’s even a 1% chance that he is our enemy then we have to take it as an absolute certainty, and we have to destroy him.”
  • gets the cheques he’s been sending to Wally (who lost his legs) returned to him with guilt-tripping messages written on them
  • watches the Senate hearing on TV where Superman arrives to respond to all the bad shit he’s supposedly done and be confronted by Wally, who blows up the building and kills everyone inside (except Supes obviously)
  • steals the kryptonite from Lex
  • exercises
  • sets traps and signals for Superman to come fight him
  • fights Superman with kryptonite weapons
  • is about to kill Superman but Superman mentions the name Martha (referring to Martha Kent, but Batman’s mom was also named Martha)
  • stops fighting and goes to rescue Martha Kent (who’s been kidnapped)
  • realizes only kryptonite can kill the newly created Doomsday; lures Doomsday back to Gotham so he can get the kryptonite spear he left there.
  • witnesses Superman sacrifice himself to kill Doomsday
  • threatens Lex, who warns of a coming evil thing
  • vows to find other metahumans so they can fight future evil
  • believes “men are still good” at the end

Written out like this, Batman’s actions appear to be pretty consistent and his hatred of Superman generally makes sense. Even his speech at the end kind of works since this is a veteran Batman whose decades of crimefighting seems to have turned him into a murderer, and seeing Superman’s sacrifice would snap him out of that. What irks me is that the World’s Greatest Detective doesn’t think it’s the least bit suspicious that Superman apparently killed a bunch of people in Africa and is complicit in the Senate hearing bombing while at the same time he’s been flying all over the world saving people, presumably for the last 18 months. Any chance someone may be trying to frame him, Bats?

Superman/Clark Kent…

  • saves Lois in Africa by charging a guy through a freaking wall
  • sees one news report about Batman; wants Batman dead (but not “dead,” dead)
  • does a few actually heroic things
  • sees people on TV debate whether he should be hero-ing; gets very, very sad
  • talks to Lois about how shitty people are being to him, thinks the idea of Superman is dumb
  • arrives at Senate hearing; doesn’t notice suicide wheelchair before it goes off
  • goes off to the mountains to have useless conversation with his Ghost Dad
  • saves Lois from Lex
  • gets blackmailed by Lex into fighting Batman
  • tries for approximately 10 seconds to explain the situation to Batman, then gives up and starts throwing him through buildings
  • almost gets killed before hilariously blurting out “save Marthaaaaaaaa”
  • goes back to Lex; stands there while Lex puts finishing touches on Doomsday
  • flies Doomsday out into space; gets hit by nuke
  • shakes it off, flies back down to fight Doomsday
  • saves Lois; decides ‘this is my world’
  • sacrifices himself to kill Doomsday
  • gets buried
  • is obviously not gonna stay dead

This has got to be the single worst characterization of Superman on the big screen. Zack Snyder and his screenwriters have managed to turn a pop icon, a symbol of inspiration and hope, who helps people because it’s the right thing to do, into a mopey prick who’s seriously conflicted about whether or not he should be helping anyone because some people don’t like him. That is actually what he’s struggling with in the movie. And that would’ve been fine if something in the story convinced him that humanity is worth saving, like maybe some sage advice from his goodhearted parents? Oh wait, the living one tells him he doesn’t owe humanity shit, and the dead one’s lesson implies that he shouldn’t help people because all actions have consequences.

So his arc is that he goes from basically hating mankind because they complain about him sometimes (so much so that he straight up leaves for the mountains before Lois gets kidnapped again), to resigning himself to killing someone if they can’t be reasoned with, to willing to sacrifice himself because he loves the world? Can you connect the dots with a pencil if they’re on separate sheets of paper in different rooms?

Perry White…

  • chastises Clark Kent for prioritizing reporting on Batman’s vigilantism over sports
  • allows Lois Lane to do whatever the hell she wants

Lois Lane…

  • gets taken hostage in Africa; gets saved by Superman
  • investigates weird bullets used by bad guys in Africa
  • gets kidnapped by Lex Luthor; gets saved by Superman
  • goes to help Superman before Batman kills him; takes kryptonite spear and throws it into some water
  • realizes only kryptonite can kill the newly created Doomsday (absolutely no way she can know this); goes back to water to retrieve spear she threw away
  • almost drowns; gets saved by Superman

Lois Lane’s purpose in the movie is to be rescued. Nothing else she does matters in any way.

Martha Kent…

  • tells Clark to either be the hero and symbol for hope that humanity needs or tell humanity to go fuck itself
  • gets kidnapped by Lex Luthor’s hired goons; gets saved by Batman

Ghost Jonathan Kent…

  • tells Clark a story, the moral of which is basically “if you do a good thing, bad things will happen as a result”

Clark really needed to be protected from these people when he was a boy.

Wonder Woman…

  • borrows a device Bruce Wayne was using to steal encrypted info from Lex Luthor
  • returns said device
  • sees Doomsday on TV; goes to fight Doomsday

Actually maybe this is the most consistent character arc in the movie.

Lex Luthor…

  • finds kryptonite
  • “lures” Superman to Africa because Lois was there; has a bunch of people killed to frame him?
  • talks some guy (way too easily) into giving him full access to Zod’s ship and Zod’s body
  • gains a ton of knowledge from Zod’s talking ship?
  • returns Bruce Wayne’s cheques to Wally back to him with guilt-tripping messages because he somehow knows Wayne is Batman?
  • coerces Wally into blowing up Senate hearing to frame Superman even more?
  • uses Zod’s body to create Doomsday monster
  • kidnaps Martha Kent
  • kidnaps Lois Lane for the express purpose of pushing her off a building just so Superman will come save her
  • blackmails Superman into fighting Batman
  • unleashes Doomsday
  • disappears from the movie until he somehow lands in jail
  • apparently loses his mind

You’ll notice that I don’t seem very sure about Lex Luthor’s actions in the movie. That’s because I’m not, and that’s because they don’t make any damn sense.

How does having a bunch of people in Africa SHOT BY GUNS make it look like Superman did it?
Why does Lex seem to be losing his mind before he starts talking to the Kryptonian ship (I mean, if it starts happening afterwards at least you can connect those dots into something plausible)
Why does he blow up the Senate hearing? The news immediately reports that Wally is the one who set off the bomb so there’s no way it could look like Superman did it, so WTF?
What’s his problem with Batman?
What the hell is his plan if Doomsday successfully kills Superman?

Since we’re talking about character motivation, let’s not forget the reason Lex hates Superman so much is because he wasn’t around when his dad hit him or something.

And in case you were worried the big fight with Doomsday was gonna result in even more dead bodies and destruction, Anderson Cooper helpfully points out on the news that the work day is over and therefore ALL of downtown is empty.

This movie is insane.

Thoughts on Avengers: Age of Ultron

hjkhThere will be spoilers.

During the audio commentary for The Avengers Blu-ray/DVD, writer/director Joss Whedon remarks candidly that he didn’t think his big Marvel superhero team-up was a great movie, but “a great time.” And he was right. I love the movie, and I return to it often on Blu-ray, but there really isn’t much more to it than a great time. Now that’s no small feat, especially with all the moving parts Whedon had to juggle, but even before signing on to direct The Avengers, Whedon was renowned for his ability to explore complex themes and write well rounded characters within conventional genres, and that’s why Buffy, Angel and Firefly became cult favorites. Those shows were a ton of fun, but they were also emotionally and thematically rich. They’re proof that Whedon can do more than entertain.

With Avengers: Age of Ultron, Whedon brings the gang back together for a lot more CGI punching and smashing, and again it’s fun to watch (though the core concept isn’t as shiny the second time around), but this time there’s much more to chew on in terms of theme and character. For a really nice exploration of said themes, check out this article by Devin Faraci at Birth.Movies.Death. Almost everything that happens in Age of Ultron can be traced back to character, and despite what some elitist critics might say, this movie really is about something. It’s thoughtful, funny, hugely ambitious, and it’s got a soul. I know everyone likes to groan about the Marvel Movie Machine and how these blockbusters are designed for mass consumption and the selling of merchandise, but any mega franchise that opens with an arrogant (yet charismatic) weapons manufacturer almost losing his life but instead finding his heart, and closes a major chapter with a robot and a synthezoid (created by that same weapons manufacturer) meditating on the nature of humanity…. I mean, there’s something to that, you know?

vvhhj

More thoughts on Avengers: Age of Ultron, in a bullet list, in no particular order:

  • The opening assault on Hydra is my favorite set piece in the film, with the “tie-in” shot evoking fist-pumping memories of a similar shot from the first film. Of course, this means all the remaining set pieces fail to top it. Captain America: The Winter Soldier remains the best Marvel movie in terms of action.
  • Music continues to be a weak link in the MCU, though Age of Ultron‘s score is probably the most memorable because they didn’t change the main theme like they have for every Iron Man, Thor and Captain America sequel. And I liked that composer Brian Tyler was able to incorporate his Iron Man theme into the Hulkbuster fight. Didn’t notice Cap’s theme from Winter Soldier at any point, though.
  • There has been a ton of backlash on the internet with regards to Black Widow and her relationship with Bruce Banner, specifically the scene where she reveals to him that she was sterilized during her training in the Red Room. These critics are calling this reveal misogynist because they think it redefines Natasha’s character as ‘the female who believes she’s damaged because she can’t have children.’ I’m with the film’s defenders (like Alyssa Rosenberg at Washington Post), who understand that the scene is really a lament on the choices both Natasha and Bruce have had taken away from them, and the ability to have children is a part of that, but not all of it.
  • As villains go, Ultron certainly had the potential to stand out from the pack of generic Marvel bad guys seeking world destruction. And while James Spader’s performance gives the titular robot a sarcastic flavor that only Spader can provide, Ultron is no different from all the other sentient machines encountered in science fiction. It feels like there should have been more to the Stark/Ultron relationship. If Tony’s the mad scientist, Ultron is his monster and his progeny, but the reasons Ultron hates Tony so much aren’t very well defined. I mean, you can infer some of it from his dialogue, but it’s not enough. As a precursor to Civil War, I would have loved to have seen the Avengers go up against an Ultron that’s more a product of Tony’s worst impulses – the part of him that “can’t tell the difference between saving the world and destroying it.”
  • I’m guessing a lot of Quicksilver was left on the cutting room floor. Out of the four new main characters, he makes the smallest impression, and not even his heroic death can make up for it. The version of Quicksilver (played by Evan Peters) in X-Men: Days of Future Past wins this faceoff.
  • The Vision – you know how you can tell if a character is awesome? They make the biggest impression with the least amount of screen time.
  • Unsurprisingly, the Avengers wind up saving the day – rescuing the people stranded on the floating city of Sokovia and everyone else on Earth below it. But as I watched the movie, I couldn’t shake the feeling that that wasn’t supposed to happen, and that some part of the Avengers’ mission should have failed. It would’ve been in keeping with the theme of consequences (“Everyone creates the thing they dread”), and it would’ve set up the coming conflict between Cap and Tony in Civil War. I could be way off base here, but it’s possible Whedon and Kevin Feige had a darker ending for the film in mind but some Disney/Marvel bigwigs wouldn’t go for it. And now there’s going to have to be some other kind of devastating event to set the plot of Civil War in motion.
  • Let’s talk for a second about how great Hawkeye was this time around. As the one real human with no special abilities (we don’t know for certain if Black Widow is enhanced like she is in the comics), and a surprisingly normal personal life, Barton serves as a reminder of what it is the Avengers fight for. Funnily enough, his role here reminds me of Green Arrow’s introduction in Justice League Unlimited, where Batman tells him that his presence in the League would “keep us honest.”
  • Where would I rank Age of Ultron in the MCU? Probably 3rd or 4th, after Winter Soldier, Iron Man, and maybe the first Avengers. Ultron is probably a deeper film than all of those, but it falls short on the action front, and Loki remains the better villain (of the movies. The best villain of the entire MCU is Vincent D’Onofrio as Wilson Fisk in Daredevil). I hope the talk of an extended version of the movie coming to DVD is true. I really would love to see the 195-minute cut that Whedon has mentioned in interviews.

Favorite Movies of 2014

snowpiercerI’m still playing catch-up with several of the more high profile releases (Birdman, The Imitation Game, Selma, etc.), but even without having seen those films, there were still a lot more than 10 movies that I loved in 2014. Here are 15 of the most memorable:

Honorable mention: Boyhood
Without a doubt, Boyhood is a special kind of achievement. The idea of shooting a movie over the course of 12 years, and the way the film so subtly marks the passage of time  it just sneaks up on you  is something that deserves to be recognized.

And yet, if I’m being completely honest, upon my first viewing of the film I found myself admiring it a lot more than actually liking it. There are scenes that I absolutely love, but despite the intimate, personal nature of the story, it didn’t quite hit the emotional beats I thought it would. The purpose of this list is to celebrate the movies I enjoyed the most or stayed with me long after I saw them, and Boyhood is an example of the latter, but more for the groundbreaking shooting schedule than anything else at this point. I am definitely looking forward to seeing the film again, but for now the best I can do is this honorable mention.

Captain America: The Winter Soldier / Guardians of the Galaxy
It’s a shame overall box office was down this past summer, considering more good-to-great blockbusters were released when compared to 2013. Case in point: Marvel Studios continued its winning streak with arguably the two best (and least superhero-y) films in its Cinematic Universe so far. The Winter Soldier, an all-around terrific sequel that doesn’t fall into the trap of repeating what its predecessor did, felt like a Bourne movie crossed with a political thriller, and Guardians was just an absolute blast. Writer/director James Gunn and his stellar cast easily made up for the fact that the film’s plot was basically a carbon copy of The Avengers, by focusing in on this motley crew of charming space misfits, led by the awesome Burt Macklin, FBI Chris Pratt.

Edge of Tomorrow
Another example of the year’s stellar summer output was this Tom Cruise vehicle that turned out to be a very pleasant surprise. What could have been another generic sci-fi action flick (like 2013’s Oblivion, which also starred Cruise) quickly revealed itself to be far more clever, funny and thrilling than the uninspired marketing and godawful title would have you believe.

Enemy / Nightcrawler
It’s a great time to be Jake Gyllenhaal, who in recent years has been making some very smart choices in the roles he’s taken. In 2014, Gyllenhaal pulled double duty in the criminally overlooked Enemy, a mindbending slow burn of a thriller that practically demands repeat viewings to uncover all of its secrets. But Gyllenhaal’s dual roles in that movie were a mere warm-up compared to the career-best performance he gives in the dark and hypnotic Nightcrawler. Gyllenhaal enthralls as the sociopathic Lou Bloom, whose pursuit of the American Dream takes such dark turns that you simultaneously don’t want to see what happens next yet can’t look away. I imagine that was writer/director Dan Gilroy’s goal, as Nightcrawler forces us to question the role we play as viewers of the trashier, more exploitative side of news media.

Gone Girl
I was surprised by the number of times I laughed during Gone Girl. I haven’t read Gillian Flynn’s novel (she also wrote the screenplay), so I don’t know if the dark humor was carried over or if it was something that director David Fincher brought to it, though the latter wouldn’t surprise me in the least. Whenever I read or watch his interviews, Fincher always strikes me as having a twisted sense of humor. With Gone Girl, it seems like he found the perfect material to let that side of him shine through, and the result is a murder mystery that’s superior to his immaculately crafted but completely uninspired adaptation of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. Ben Affleck and Rosamund Pike are fantastic as the leads, but the most memorable performance may have been from Carrie Coon, who also made quite an impression on me in HBO’s “The Leftovers.”

The Grand Budapest Hotel
There ain’t no movie like a Wes Anderson movie. Even if you don’t know his name, you can always tell if you’re watching one of his films, so singular is his visual style. But that doesn’t mean his movies are samey, nor does it mean he sacrifices substance for that style. Take his latest, for example. The Grand Budapest Hotel, with its luxurious production design and shifting aspect ratios, is dryly funny (Ralph Fiennes has never been better), and many scenes take on the manic pacing of the screwball comedies of old. But the wartime setting, and retrospective way the story is told, eventually reveals something more thoughtful and emotional. And it’s that emotion, so carefully sprinkled throughout, that allows it to rise above the idea of the film as light confection (though you could hardly be blamed for enjoying the film on that level). It’s just a pleasure to watch unfold.

The Guest
Whoever came up with the idea of casting Dan Stevens (the boring one on “Downton Abbey.” No, the other boring one.) as the human monster in this brutally entertaining horror film is a genius. Sporting an American accent, and playing a guy so far removed from the stuffiness of the BBC drama, Stevens has completely changed my original perception of him, and his work here shows that he has the potential to break out in a big way.

Interstellar
Is it everything I hoped it would be? Almost. But as much as I tend to love Chris Nolan’s films, even I can’t ignore the poor dialogue and his tendency to over-indulge in the pursuit of epic epicness (lose the entire Matt Damon section and I’d be a lot happier with the film as a whole). That being said, there’s a scene in the middle of Interstellar that is one of the most poignant movie moments of the year. It shows us that Nolan continues to make strides in giving his densely plotted tales the emotional heft they need to engage not just the mind, but the heart as well.

The Lego Movie
Hilarious, clever and surprisingly touching, The Lego Movie shows that even the most cynical and financially motivated of Hollywood product can be a real winner if you’ve got the right filmmakers behind the camera. Writers/directors Chris Miller and Phil Lord have made a career out of taking the flimsiest of concepts and breathing some real life into them (they’re also responsible for 21 Jump Street and its sequel). The Lego Movie would have been a great time had it just played out as a wacky adventure starring generic Lego figure Emmett (Chris Pratt, killing it again), but Miller and Lord go one step further. They know that for a lot of people, those colorful blocks are more than just toys. Not only are they capable of bringing kids and parents together, but they can ignite a child’s imagination in a way that few things can. The film is a celebration of that creative spark.

Life Itself
I may just do this for fun, but I wouldn’t be doing it at all were it not for Roger Ebert. It’s because of him that I love movies as much as I do, that I read about movies as much as I do, that the internet is so alive with people’s opinions and perspectives on and troubles with and celebrations of movies. Based on Ebert’s memoir, Life Itself is a warm and heartfelt tribute to the late critic, who always stood out to me because it never felt like he was talking down to me or showing off how much smarter he was than me through his writing. I read a lot of reviews, and often it just feels like critics are actively trying to confuse you. I could read hundreds and hundreds of words and sometimes still not be able to tell if this guy (let’s call him Armond White) actually liked what he saw. But Ebert understood what the purpose of reviewing was: to let people know if a certain movie was worth seeing or not. Ebert wasn’t some extraordinary, larger than life figure. He was a normal guy with flaws, and while his career was a great success, you could tell watching the film that his family is what made him happiest, and his illness, even at its most painful, wasn’t going to take that away from him. Life Itself can be difficult to watch at times. There are scenes throughout that show Ebert, missing his jaw and unable to speak due to cancer, going through rehab or being in obvious pain, but they’re counteracted by moments of obvious joy. It’s absolutely worth seeing.

The Raid 2
I was not a big fan of The Raid: Redemption. My problem with its nonstop action, strikingly choreographed and shot though it was, is that it never really took a moment to take a breath. That film was pitched at 11 for its entire runtime, to the point where it started to feel monotonous and numbing. With The Raid 2, Gareth Evans has expanded the scope of his cop vs. (many) gangsters tale, and the result, while unwieldy at times, is one of the most visceral action epics of the last several years. The set pieces in this movie are just a sight to behold: the camera moves so fluidly and the sequences are edited so crisply that you feel the full impact of every punch, kick, blow, slash, etc. In terms of pure action, it’s the best movie of the year.

Snowpiercer
This summer, while everyone was busy losing three hours of their lives (and pieces of their souls) to Michael Bay, smarter people (or at least people who didn’t hate themselves) chose to see Snowpiercer, Bong Joon-ho’s wild and inventive dystopian action epic. Set aboard a train carrying the last of humanity as it travels around a now-frozen earth, the lower class survivors at the back of the train (led by Chris Evans in a revelatory performance) revolt and make their way forward through the middle and upper class cars in thrilling fashion, as Bong makes his statements on class warfare purely through his visuals. It’s a refreshing spin on your typical dystopian science fiction, and best of all, it’s an hour shorter than Transformers.

Two Days, One Night
In this French-language film, a working class woman, ready to return to work after suffering a nervous breakdown, finds that her co-workers have voted to have her lose her job permanently in order to receive pay raises. Now she has a weekend to convince each of them to change their minds. Despite the ticking clock, Two Days, One Night is not some fast paced thriller. There’s no shocking twist, no villain. There are only people (some kind and compassionate, others selfish and rude) working to make ends meet. It so authentically captures the hardships of life that can befall any of us. And at the center of the film, providing its big, beating heart is Marion Cotillard, delivering one of the most empathetic performances of the year. Her Sandra goes on an emotional roller coaster, and Cotillard, with her wonderfully expressive face, takes us on that journey with her as we observe Sandra’s anxiety, her hopefulness, her fear, her determination, her soul. Two Days, One Night may not transcend time and space, pose questions about mankind’s place in the universe, or capture 12 years in the life of a young boy, but it is the most human story of the year.

Under the Skin
This is definitely a case of differing consensus between critics and general audiences. Currently holding a one star rating on Netflix Canada yet appearing on several critics’ top 10 lists (in the top spot in many cases), all I can say about Jonathan Glazer’s Under the Skin is that it stuck in my mind in a way that no other movie has in a while. I’d be lying if I said my attention never wavered during the film, but that’s only because it refused to explain itself (it’s an anti-Nolan movie in that way), leaving me to think about what was happening more than usual. Here, Scarlett Johansson plays an alien being of some kind who drives around Scotland luring unsuspecting men to their apparent deaths. The purpose of her mission isn’t explained and never becomes clear, but what does become apparent is the effect that her human guise and interactions with these men (one in particular with a disorder that disfigures his face) end up having on her.

It’s actually been quite a year for Johansson, appearing in three wildly different films where she played characters that felt thematically linked. In addition to the creature she plays in Under the Skin, she also reprised her role as the calculating yet compassionate Black Widow in Captain America: The Winter Soldier. And as the title character in Lucy, she displays a range that runs from traumatized and helpless to inhuman and omnipotent as a result of a drug that unlocks the dormant abilities of her brain. That’s a ridiculous premise, no doubt, and while Lucy isn’t top 10 (or top 15) material, Johansson’s performance is fantastic and serves as an interesting mirror to her role in Under the Skin.

I could cite a number of qualities that make the film stand out, like the cinematography or the unusual score or the unexpected visual effects work, but in the end, Johansson  who I consider to be one of the smartest and most talented actors of her generation – is the reason Under the Skin got under my… something. (I can’t write anymore.)

A look back at Batman’s big screen adventures

In honor of the 75th anniversary of the Bat-Man’s comic book debut (in the pages of Detective Comics in 1939), and because he’s my favorite superhero ever, I’m devoting the next several blog posts to a retrospective on some of the Caped Crusader’s most iconic appearances in film, television, and gaming. One of the reasons the character has endured for so long is because he’s proven to be incredibly adaptable to every form of media. In the comics, he started out as a vigilante (who killed people), then became less murder-y and more campy, then turned dark again along with a healthy dose of brooding. My introduction to Batman began in film and TV before I started reading comics, and while I haven’t kept up with that in recent years, I have sampled most, if not all of his big and small screen adventures. In this post, I look back on the Dark Knight’s career in movies:

Batman (1966)

Come on, how can you not love a movie in which Batman fends off a rubber shark using Shark-repellent Bat Spray? The movie version of the 1966 Batman TV series isn’t much more than a double-length episode of the show, and that was more than okay with me. As a kid, I enjoyed the movie mostly because there were dudes with masks and capes punching bad guys. As an adult, I was able to appreciate the comedy and the joyfully over-the-top nature of the performances. The movie is hilarious and fun in the same way that Batman & Robin (more on that below) is hilarious and un-fun.

Favorite moment: It always makes me laugh when Robin deduces that Catwoman is a member of a newly formed gang of rogues (that also includes Joker, Penguin and the Riddler) because the early shark attack happened at sea (“Sea? C for Catwoman!”), but by far the best moment is this one:

Batman (1989)

I revisited the film recently in honor of the 25th anniversary of its theatrical release and I was struck by just how bizarre the whole thing is, but not in a, “What was I thinking liking this movie?” kind of way. Half of what happens in the movie doesn’t make any sense, but it remains fast paced and highly watchable. Many people were quick to dismiss what Jack Nicholson did in this movie when The Dark Knight came out, but it’s an entertainingly hammy performance, nicely offset by Michael Keaton’s mostly internalized approach. I had no trouble at all getting into the film; it’s mostly responsible for my love for the character.

Oh, and that Danny Elfman score. Absolutely perfect.

Favorite moment: I love Joker’s redecorating of the Flugelheim Museum set to Prince’s “Partyman,” but the most badass moment occurs just before this clip, in which two freaked out thugs shoot Batman seemingly dead, only to turn and see him stand right back up.

Batman Returns (1992)

By the time Batman Returns came around, Tim Burton had pretty much abandoned any attempt to ground this series in anything resembling reality. Between the deformed boy being raised by penguins and the dead woman being nursed back to life by cats, it became pretty clear early on that Burton saw Gotham City as some grotesque gothic playground – a world in which a bunch of supremely damaged individuals could only survive by wearing the skins of other creatures.

Batman Returns is really unlike any Batman film out there, but it’s easily one of the most entertaining. The whole thing is just so weird, and I love that.

Favorite moment: After Selina Kyle survives getting pushed out a window by her boss, she returns to her apartment and proceeds to go insane. Awesomely:

Batman: Mask of the Phantasm (1993)

The most overlooked movie here, Mask of the Phantasm was originally meant to be a direct-to-video release, but because the Animated Series (on which the movie is based) was such a success, Warner Bros. decided to release it in theatres, where it died a quick and undeserved death. It’s a shame because before Christopher Nolan’s films, it was the best Batman movie ever made, and I still hold it in pretty high regard. Set up as a murder mystery involving a brand new villain, Mask of the Phantasm tells a story from Bruce Wayne’s past that may have had a bigger impact on his decision to become Batman than even the death of his parents. Instead of the same origin story which even at this point everyone knew, we got something surprising and surprisingly effective: a love story.

Favorite moment: Young Bruce, standing before their grave, begs his parents for their permission to go back on his vow so that he can lead a normal life with the woman he loves:

Batman Forever (1995)

I watched all these movies when I was a kid, so I was unaware of anything going on behind the scenes or really noticing that anything was different onscreen. Batman was Batman no matter who was playing him, and a new Batman movie was going to be amazing whether it was actually any good or not.

So I loved Batman Forever when I first saw it, but now I’m aware of the sharp change in tone, and I see the film for what it really is: the beginning of the (first) end. As a sequel to Burton’s films, it’s a complete and utter failure, but given that Batman is now played by Val Kilmer, it’s not difficult to look at the film as its own separate thing, and if you’re willing to accept a campier and more colorful version that brings back memories of the Adam West era, it’s pretty watchable. You just have to know what you’re getting yourself into.

The “I’ll get drive-through” line really says it all.

Favorite moment: Though I still don’t understand why Batman needed to ask a riddle before destroying Riddler’s thought-sucking machine with a batarang, I do enjoy the subsequent leap Batman makes to save both love interest Chase Meridian and Robin.

Batman & Robin (1997)

And here we come to the film that killed a franchise for 8 years. I was able to accept Forever‘s attempt at a lighter Batman because it still played out as a real movie, whereas Batman & Robin simply doesn’t work on any basic level of filmmaking. It’s just two hours of puns, rubber nipples, puns, completely phoned in or just plain awful performances, and puns. It boggles my mind that the dude who wrote this script went on to win an Oscar. This should have precluded him from being eligible for any award. But probably the worst thing I can say about it is that it wasn’t even bad enough to kill the careers of anyone in the main cast. All of them survived and kept working. I have nothing else to say about Batman & Robin, except that it’s best enjoyed as something you laugh at and rip apart with your friends than as an actual movie.

Favorite moment: There’s just so many to choose from….fortunately someone was kind enough to edit them all together in one handy video:

Batman Begins (2005)

It’s pretty crazy to think about the difference in anticipation between this film when it first came out and its sequels. I recall the marketing machine wasn’t really going at 100%, and good seats were not hard to come by when my friends and I went to see it.

But we know what happened next. The movie turned out to be great and, for better or worse, was responsible for the subsequent flood of dark, serious, gritty reboots of other worn out franchises. I think it holds up very well, and does a fantastic job of tracing Bruce Wayne’s path from guilt-ridden and angry young man to hero.

Favorite moment: I stand by my belief that the chase between the Tumbler and the police is the best setpiece in Nolan’s trilogy, but the moment that made me realize this movie was special was this one (and look, there’s Joffrey Lannister!):

The Dark Knight (2008)

Plainly and simply, this is the best superhero movie ever made. All superhero stories are at its core about good vs. evil, and nowhere does that theme play out as starkly or tragically as it does here. Heath Ledger’s Joker is a creature of absolute chaos. That’s all he lives for. There is no reason or motivation and that just makes him more frightening. His schemes serve to place Batman in the most harrowing of moral quandaries, and it’s a testament to Christopher Nolan and his screenwriters’ that everything does not simply go back to normal when Batman defeats him. Both Batman and Jim Gordon had to make tough decisions in order to save their city, and when the film reaches its brutal end they’re forced to live with the consequences of those decisions.

I was completely shaken the first time I saw The Dark Knight, so much so that it’s easy for me to overlook the flaws that become apparent during subsequent viewings. Many will complain about plotholes (which is always hard to take seriously since anything and everything unexplained can be a plothole to people on the internet), and I’ll admit the editing of the action setpieces is not very good, but the film is working on a level that’s greater than the sum of its parts.

That’s what I love most about this movie. It’s a compelling crime film on its own, but there are much bigger ideas at play here that give it the kind of gravitas that’s reserved for the very best film has to offer.

Favorite moment: You can’t beat that ending:

The Dark Knight Rises (2012)

Okay, is it the best possible ending that it could have been? No. But it’s still an incredibly massive (in both scope and length) spectacle that manages to satisfactorily close out Nolan’s trilogy in a way that’s both emotionally resonant and surprisingly hopeful. I watched the film twice in theatres, the first time in IMAX, which was really something else. I do wish the seats I got weren’t so close, though.

Favorite moment: This hit hard the first time I saw it:

Side note: I never really understood why Nolan didn’t just have John Blake be the boy that Batman encounters in the first film. Sure, the boy might have been a tad too young, and Joseph Gordon-Levitt doesn’t look like Joffrey, but Maggie Gyllenhaal didn’t look like Katie Holmes. It would’ve made the connection between the first and third films much, much stronger.

Some Thoughts on The Amazing Spider-Man 2

There may be spoilers… there will probably be spoilers.

After watching The Amazing Spider-Man 2, I am now fully convinced that this reboot series (which began a mere decade after Sam Raimi’s first Spider-Man was released) does not need to exist. I say that as someone who loved Raimi’s first two Spidey flicks, but also as someone who generally liked the first Amazing Spider-Man, though there were things about Marc Webb’s first entry that didn’t sit well with me.

Whatever changes they made to Peter Parker’s origin were done just for the sake of it — to convince people they weren’t watching the same story over again. In doing so, they managed to muddle up the fundamental reason why Peter becomes Spider-Man in the first place. The adage, “With great power comes great responsibility,” is paraphrased in such a way that it actually becomes less clear, and even though it’s spoken by Uncle Ben, the sentiment is actually attributed to Peter’s father, which is pointless, and makes Ben less of an influence on Peter’s decisions. The filmmakers also introduced Peter’s parents, who abandoned Peter when he was young for reasons that were never explained.

With this new sequel, Webb had a chance to really break away from what came before, and although he doesn’t completely screw it up, he screws up enough of it to the point where we’d simply have been better off if Sony had just given in and handed the rights for the character back over to Marvel. And now with all the talk about the next sequel and a Sinister Six movie and a Venom spin-off, it’s now become impossible to not see the underlying cynicism behind all the decisions being made by whoever’s responsible for the franchise now.

But back to Peter’s parents. The new film opens with the same scene that opened the first one, but now the perspective is from Richard Parker (and Mary, kind of). They had to disappear for reasons that do eventually get explained, though my reaction to that part of the movie was, “So what?” And really, the whole opening sequence doesn’t feel like the beginning of a Spider-Man story at all; showing us how they die ultimately adds nothing to the film.

There’s simply too much going on this movie, and it never manages to balance the straightforward tone of Peter and Gwen’s romance with the bizarre supervillain antics of Electro and Green Goblin. Jamie Foxx is nothing short of a revelation here, in the worst possible way. His Max Dillon would have been right at home in Joel Schumacher’s Batman films, specifically Batman Forever. Watching this movie, all I could think about was how Electro’s story is pretty much the same as The Riddler’s. In Batman Forever, Edward Nygma idolizes Bruce Wayne, feels betrayed by him, gets blasted by electricity, and uses his abilities to exact his revenge. Actually, that’s exactly what happens here. And Foxx plays it the same way Jim Carrey did, but here’s the thing. I still like Batman Forever, because even though it departed completely from the world that Tim Burton established in Batman and Batman Returns, at least it didn’t half-ass it. Schumacher went for bright, colorful and over the top, and it mostly worked because it kept that tone throughout (Schumacher would eventually take it much too far with Batman & Robin, but we don’t need to go there).

Amazing Spider-Man 2 feels like two very different movies that got mashed up in the editing room. In one movie, we have a pretty great story about Peter and Gwen, beautifully realized by Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone. Their scenes are the reason the movie isn’t a total disaster, and they’re charming and funny because the actors are playing it straight.

Foxx and Dane DeHaan (and Paul Giamatti to a lesser extent), on the other hand? They’ve been transported in from the Schumacher version of a Spidey flick, and their characters’ actions in the movie aren’t adequately explained or feel properly motivated, and they ultimately tank the whole thing. The Peter/Gwen scenes just aren’t enough to redeem the messy plotting and one-dimensional villainy.

And what about Spidey himself? Well, all I can say is that visual effects continue to improve, so yes, it’s thrilling to see and it does make you feel like you’re webslinging alongside him, but the set pieces themselves feel perfunctory, and one of them features a ridiculous beat that has Electro tossing Spidey around a bunch of poles to the tune of “Itsy Bitsy Spider.”

But the biggest talking point of the movie is, naturally, the death of Gwen Stacy, which was handled very well, and viewers more invested in the series than I am will no doubt react the way Webb intended. And while I admit to feeling the impact of the scene, the constant foreshadowing (and almost laughable appearances of ghost Denis Leary) dulled the shock of it.

This is all my roundabout way of saying that the best Spider-Man movie is still Raimi’s Spider-Man 2, which is just as well acted, features visual effects that still hold up today, has the cleanest arc for both hero and (singular) villain, and features one of the best action set pieces in a superhero flick ever:

Favorite Movies of 2012

Long story short: a pretty tremendous year for movies. There are still a couple big contenders I haven’t seen yet (like Life of Pi and Beasts of the Southern Wild), but I wanted to get a list up while we’re still in the middle of awards season. Also, this year was so strong that I didn’t feel like arranging the list in numbered order, so I’m gonna take the slightly more boring route and present them alphabetically, but not before mentioning some highlights from the past year that didn’t make my top 10: Continue Reading

Review: The Dark Knight Rises

I recommend that you don’t read this until after you’ve seen The Dark Knight Rises.

A few personal thoughts before I get into the review proper:

After what happened on July 20 in Colorado, can Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight Rises ever be viewed purely as a form of entertainment? A work of art designed specifically for the purpose of bringing people together for a few hours, to escape the shittier things going on in the world? I think the answer to that question is an unfortunate no. The tragedy that struck that movie theater in Aurora has cast a shadow that hangs over much of the film’s 2 hour, 44 minute runtime. If anything, it’s managed to make the events of the film itself even more unsettling than they might otherwise have been (and I think most who see the film will agree, it’s dark and disturbing enough as it is).

It’s a shame really, because this final chapter in Nolan’s Batman trilogy, dark as it can be, is a thrilling, emotional piece of big budget movie-making; thrilling because of tremendous action setpieces and brutal one-on-one battles, emotional because of the pain and sacrifice that Bruce Wayne and the people he cares about most are forced to endure. But most importantly, this is a story about hope, something we can always use, but something that – in the wake of what happened in Aurora – feels more and more like it can only be found in the fantasy world that films like this live in.

Continue Reading

Review: The Amazing Spider-Man

Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) really is unlucky. His parents abandon him as a child, he’s bullied as a teenager, and his uncle is murdered by a thug that he allowed to get away with a crime. And that’s not including the fact that his story had already been told onscreen a mere decade ago, back when he was played by Tobey Maguire.

The question that everyone is asking with regards to The Amazing Spider-Man is: does this film need to exist? It’s only been ten years since Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man (and only 5 years since Spider-Man 3 was in theatres). Relatively speaking, isn’t the original film still fresh in the movie-going public’s mind?

Continue Reading

Review: Prometheus

As a couple buddies and I emerged from the theatre after seeing Ridley Scott’s Prometheus, we started making fun of it – namely the relentlessness with which events seemed to pile up on top of one another after the slow and steady build-up of the film’s first half. One friend liked the movie but had problems with it, while the other didn’t much like it at all beyond the technical aspects. I, on the other hand, was fascinated by the whole thing from beginning to end, despite the fact that I happily joined in on all the jokes being made at the film’s expense. I mean, sure, I recognized that this wasn’t a very original story (take away the film’s central theme of the search for mankind’s creators and this is basically a modified version of Scott’s Alien from 1979), that many of the supporting characters were barely sketched in at all, that the plot gets sort of muddled towards the end, and that there isn’t much in the way of closure when it gets there. But I was just so intrigued by the questions the film asked and how it chose to answer (and not answer) said questions, and I was so blown away by the visuals and the sound design and the key performances, that I found it easy to simply ignore the things that others could point to as flaws. If the movie is a masterpiece on a technical level, and flawed as a piece of storytelling, I’ll compromise and say that Prometheus is a very good film, but one where I wouldn’t feel compelled to argue if you disagree. Continue Reading

Review: Marvel’s The Avengers

I was never a regular reader of Marvel comics, or DC comics for that matter. I read Batman comics, and the occasional issue of Spider-Man, so I really had no expectations or hopes for Marvel’s self-produced series of films that began four years ago with 2008’s Iron Man. That turned out to be a great movie (and pretty much all of its greatness was on account of Robert Downey Jr.’s brilliant lead performance). Since then, four other Marvel movies (all of which take place in the same continuity) have been released to varying degrees of success. I enjoyed all of them on some level, but none were the equal of Tony Stark’s first adventure.

Well, that’s changed with the release of Marvel’s The Avengers, the superhero team-up that brings Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk, Thor, Captain America, and various agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. together for an epic battle against alien forces brought to Earth by villain Loki (Thor’s half-brother). Not only is The Avengers similar in tone to Iron Man, but it manages to be even more impressive than that film in a few key areas. Continue Reading